Tag Archives: FPTP

Fṛm Đ Gardịn: After 44 years, Labour is expelling me. And my MP and activist friends are asking: who will be next?

Labour leader Keir Starmer at County Hall, London, 27 June 2023. Photograph: Stefan Rousseau/PA
Lebr līdr Cir Starmr at Cǎntihōl, Lundn, 27 Jūn 2023. Foṭgraf: Stefan Rousseau/PA

Aftr 44 yirz, Lebr z xpelñ m. N mî MP n acṭvist frendz r ascñ: hu wl b nxt?

Transcription of a Guardian article of 30 June 2023

Ɖr sīm t b bŭliz at ɖ top hu d’nt unḍstand plŭṛlizm. Ɖe si onli tru b’livrz n sworn eṇmiz

Neal Lawson

Nìl Lwsn, Frîde, 30 Jūn 2023

Last Frîde an īmeil fṛm ɖ Lebr parti – v ẃć I’v bn a membr fr 44 yirz – brouc mî p’liticl hart. Ɖe rout coldli t tel m ɖt bac in Me 2021, I’d cmitd a crîm: rītwītñ a Lib Dém MP’z cōl fr sm votrz t bac Grīn canddets in locl ilex́nz, acumṗnid bî mî sjsćn ɖt sć crosparti cooṗreśn reprizntd “grounup pṛgresiv poḷtics”. Mî puniśmnt? Xpulśn.

Ẃ dd I se ɖt, ẃ on rʈ am I biyñ xpeld fr it, n ẃt mt it mīn fr ɖ fyćr v ǎr poḷtics? I sd it fr tū rīznz. Frst, bcz ɖ pṛgresiv mjoṛti in ǎr cuntri z ʈwortd bî ɖ ilectṛl sistm. Vots on ɖ rît g olmst xclusivli t ɖ Toriz, bt ɖ pṛgresiv vot z olwz split btwn Lebr, Lib Démz n Grīnz. Undr frst past ɖ post (FPƉP) ɖ Cnsrṿtivz win on a mnoṛti v ɖ vot, agn n agn. Cooṗreśn btwn pṛgresivz jst mcs sns.

Bt ɖ riyl rīzn I sd it z bcz cooṗreśn z ẃt ppl d ẃn ɖe hv brōdli śerd golz bt brñ difṛnt atṛbyts n îdīaz t ɖ tebl. In evri aspect v ǎr dêli lîvz, w s’xid ẃn w wrc rspctḟli wɖ uɖrz. It’s cōld plŭṛlizm, n it seḷbrets ǎr difṛnsz in ɖ śr-fîr nolij ɖt eni fyćr wrʈ hvñ z wn w ngośiet wɖ uɖrz rɖr ɖn wn impozd on s.

Ɖ Lebr parti wz fǎndd on ɖ prínsipl v plŭṛlizm: it wz a feḍreśn v tredyńnz n soṣ́list ssaytiz ɖt cooṗretd fr a comn prṗs. Its iniśl ilectṛl brecʈru cem in 1906 bcz ɖ Libṛl parti std asd in 30 sīts. Ɖ spîn v Lebr’z rmarcbl 1945 maṇfesto cem fṛm ɖ Libṛl mîndz v Jon Mênard Cīnz n Wiłm Beṿrij. N ɖen, bfr 1997, Toni Bler n Padi Aśdǎn forjd a stroñ bond t gt ɖ Toriz ǎt n uśr a ny Britn in.

Tde Lebr caunslrz wrc hand in hand wɖ Grīnz n Lib Démz t dfnd cḿṇtiz fṛm Tori cuts. In Wêlz Lebr runz ɖ cuntri s’xesḟli in alayns wɖ Plaid Cymru, ɖ Wlś naśṇlists.

Ɖs rịlistic n hopfl poḷtics z ɖ hart n soul v Lebr. It fîndz mīnñfl xpreśn nǎ in ɖ oṿẃlmñ bacñ v membrz n yńnz fr pṛporśnl repriznteśn (PR), so ɖt ol vots cǎnt īqli n ɖus būst ɖ Lib Démz n ɖ Grīnz at ɖ xpns v ɖ Toriz. It sjsts a wrld in ẃć Lebr dz az wel az poṣbl bt nz ɖt guṿnñ wɖ uɖrz z betr ɖn luzñ alon. Ɖs z ẃr I stand – on ɖ śoldrz v jaynts sć az Jon Smiʈ, Nìl Ciṇc, Robin Cc, Mo Mǒḷm n tde, Ed Miḷband n Andi Brnm. So, ẃ yz an uncntnśs twīt fṛm ovr tū yirz ago t trî t xpel m?

Ɖ rīzn z ɖt ɖ parti-mśīn z no longr run in ɖs loñ n rić spirit v plŭṛlizm. It hz bn capćrd bî a clīc hu si onli tru b’livrz or sworn eṇmiz. Ɖe r bhevñ lîc plêgrǎnd bŭliz, yzñ ppl’z desṗreśn t gt rid v Toriz n ɖ liṃteśnz v ɖ votñsistm t infors diṣplin intrṇli n xtrṇli. Ol ɖs z fast amǎntñ t an abysiv rleśnśp in ẃć frst past ɖ post gvz membrz no rịlistic oltrṇtiv parti t līv fr, n ɖ votrz nẃr els t pt ɖer cros. PR z ɖ rùt t a pṛgresiv snć̣ri, bt fr ɖ Lebr mśīn ɖt wd mīn sacṛfîsñ its doṃnirñ pǎr: most v its bhevyr nǎ oriɉnetd in ɖs paṛnôd, top-dǎn we v p’liticl ʈncñ.

It dz’nt sīm t matr t ɖ clīcs at ɖ top ɖt īvn mîldli radicl poḷsiz r biyñ junct or wōtrd dǎn – fṛm rentcntrolz t ɖ £28bn-a-yir grīn trnziśn – or ɖt Lebr’z līdr ćuzz ɖ Rūṗt Mrdoc paʈ t pǎr ovr ɖ pṛgresiv-mjoṛti rùt. Ɖe bat awe sjsćnz ɖt īvn f Lebr rūl wl b betr ɖn ɖ Cnsrṿtivz, it wl nt b gd inuf t dīl wɖ a prṃcrîsis wrld, n its śeci hold on pǎr cd denjṛsli pev ɖ we t oʈoṛterịn popylizm. Mor ɖn enʈñ, ɖ mśīn dz’nt cer f ɖr’z an absns v hop in its project: it dz’nt matr ẃt y ʈnc or fīl, so loñ az y obījntli s’port it.

I fīl a dīp sadnis ɖt I’v traid t d mî bit t mc Lebr a mor hopfl, ambiśs, jenṛs n cmpaśṇt ples, n evrʈñ hz cm t ɖs end. I fīl ɖ hrt v siyñ mî MP n acṭvist frendz caud bî ɖ fir ɖt ɖe me b nxt; ɖt ɖe mst wōc sm arbitrri lîn ɖt cīps ɖm constntli woćñ ɖer bacs. I fīl śoct ɖt ɖ fax́ṇlizm I wornd agnst at ɖ start v ɖ yir in ɖz pejz hz tecn its rvnj n priti mć pruvd ɖ pônt: it’s a peti tiṛni. It wl b trajic f ɖs z ɖ culćr Lebr tecs intu guvnmnt, bcz it wl fel. N it’s nt partibyṛcrats hu wl pe ɖ prîs, bt ɖ neśn.

Poḷtics cn b bytifl or brūtl. It cn b a ples v drīmz n hop, c’lectiv indevr, jeṇroṣti n luv. Or it cn dnî ol ɖoz ʈñz. In hiz aḷgoricl ple Ɖ Crūṣbl, abt ɖ MCarʈiît wićhunts in ɖ YS, Arʈr Milr raits: “Y nǒ in ol yr blac harts ɖt ɖs b frōd … Y r pŭlñ Hevn dǎn!”

Lebr’z prṣktrz n wićfîndrz r’nt ɖ bst v ɖ parti, jst ɖ ppl hu cuṛntli hapn t b at ɖ top. Ɖe r hard bt britl. Inevitbli, lîc ol bŭliz, ɖe hv t b jenṛsli bt frmli std p t, untl ɖe unḍstand ɖer ǒn inṣkṛtiz n cn start t hīl. T mî akzrz, I ɖrfr snd mî luv.

Y cn fît olmst enʈñ bt ɖ zîtgîst, ɖt inevitbl spirit ɖt śeps ǎr lîvz. Tde, in ɖ fes v inorṃs ćaḷnjz n oṗtyṇtiz, ol w hv z ǎr inṭcnctidnis n ǎr śerd hymaṇti. Pluralism, ɖt ugli bt pǎrfl wrd, z ɖ fors ɖt wl śep enʈñ ɖt z pṛgresiv. Bcz it z rît, it z gd, bcz it wrcs n ppl olmst evrẃr nǒ it. Ɖs vri hymn truʈ z ɖ oṗzit v ɖ mesij I wz snt in ɖt cold n clinicl īmeil. Smẃr in ɖer harts, I sspct ɖ ppl hu rout it nǒ ɖt az wel.

***

Nìl Lwsn z d’rectr v ɖ cros-parti campen orġnîześn Cumṗs

Instroduction to Ñspel

"House by the Railroad," Edward Hopper, 1925

Fṛm Đ Gardịn: There is a way to oust the Tories, and stop them ever rising again. Why won’t we do it?

‘Ẃ w’nt Cir Starmr n Lebr’z old gard … g wɖ ɖ flo v last wīc’s rzults?’ Ɖ Lebr līdr teḷfonz votrz on poulñ de, 4 Me 2023. Foṭgraf: Stefan Rousseau/PA
‘Ẃ w’nt Cir Starmr n Lebr’z old gard … g wɖ ɖ flo v last wīc’s rzults?’ Ɖ Lebr līdr teḷfonz votrz on poulñ de, 4 Me 2023. Foṭgraf: Stefan Rousseau/PA

Ɖr z a we t ǎst ɖ Toriz, n stop ɖm evr rîzñ agn. Ẃ w’nt w d it?

(Transcription of a Guardian editorial of 9 May 2023)

Nǎ ɖ dust hz setld on ɖ locl ilex́nz, cǎnt ɖ rîtwñ vots n ɖen ɖ pṛgresiv wnz, n si ẃ PR z mor vîtl ɖn evr

Neal Lawson

Nìl Lwsn, Tyzde 9 Me 2023

Amd ɖ p’liticl sǎnd n fyri stl rvrḅretñ aftr ɖ sêizmic locl ilex́nz in Ñgḷnd, ɖr z a qaytr bt dtrmind nôz eṃnetñ fṛm ɖ cǎntiz n śîrz. It z ɖ sǎnd v a ny poḷtics, best nt on hybris or partitrîḅlizm bt a b’lif ɖt, in ɖz complex, fast-muvñ tîmz, onli cros-parti cooṗreśn cn win pǎr n yz it ifctivli.

In Hartsmir n Bracnl, in Luis n Weṿli, acrs ɖ Lundn cḿtr blt in Suri, Cnt, Hartfdśr, Susix n mor, pṛgresiv-parti acṭvists rfyzd t b bìtn bî an ilectṛl sistm ɖt z stact agnst ɖm.

Ɖer s’xes wz drivn bî tū simpl facts. Frst, on ɖ rgresiv sîd v ɖ baḷtpepr ɖr wz onli wn ples t pt yr X, on ɖ pṛgresiv sîd, at līst ʈri. Tîrd v splitñ ɖ vot n letñ ɖ rît ʈru on a mnoṛtiśer v ɖ vot, acṭvists hv bn wrcñ undr ɖ redar t foc̣s ẃr ɖe cn win. Ɖs dīp tacticl campenñ ɖen alînz wɖ unpresdntd levlz v tacticl votñ, n ɖ rzults fr ɖ Toriz wr devstetñli bad.

Secnd, ɖ alarmñ bt comn nolij ɖt w liv in a prṃcrîsis wrld v ic̣nomic, jioṗliticl, tecṇlojicl n clîṃt ceos. W nīd an indyrñ n trnsforṃtiv ny pṛgresiv cnsnss, lîc ɖt v 1945, bt, unlîc ɖt postwor setlmnt, it’s nt gwñ t cm fṛm a sngl-parti sors bt a multiparti’layns.

Ẃt brñz ɖs obvịs ilectṛl n guṿnñ poḷtics tgɖr z, v cors, pṛporśnl repriznteśn (PR). Ɖ ofr t ćenj ǎr votñsistm galṿnîzz ɖ letnt pṛgresiv mjoṛti in ǎr cuntri n enśurz ɖ Toriz cn nvr guvn agn wɖt a mjoṛti v ɖ cuntri bacñ ɖm. It ofrz ɖ posbiḷti v a loñ-trm n stebl cọliśn t tec on ɖ rībildñ v ɖ NHS, alñ wɖ ʈǎzndz v ny aforḍbl homz n ɖ rês t net ziro.

N yt ɖs ny poḷtics v cooṗreśn z haṗnñ dspt partilīdrz, nt bcz v ɖm. Sadli, Lebr z ɖ bigist bloc wɖ its līdrśp rpitidli clemñ PR w’nt b in its maṇfesto ẃl rjctñ cooṗreśn.

Ɖs cd b ilectṛl suisîd. Ol ɖ sīńr poulñpundits pridict Lebr wl strugl t win a mjoṛti at ɖ nxt jenṛl ilex́n. Wɖ ɖ locl rzults sjstñ a naśnl-iqivḷnt līd v jst sevn psntijpônts, evrʈñ pônts t a huñ parḷmnt. T pt ɖs in pspctiv, Ed Miḷband dd betr n wnt on t lūz in 2015, n in 1996 Ny Lebr wz 14 pônts ahd v ɖ Toriz.

Last wīc bròt a starc rmîndr v ɖ absrdti v Lebr nt bacñ PR. In ɖ Bedḟd meṛl ilex́n, ɖ pṛgresiv vot wz mor ɖn 30,000, ɖ Tori vot jst 16,000. Bt ɖ Toriz wún bî 145 vots. Pṛgresivz cntiny t dvîd, n ɖ rît cntinyz t concr.

Lebr hz a ćôs. A fyćr undr ǎr cuṛnt frst-past-ɖ-post (FPƉP) votñ sistm mīnz ɖ ppl wɖ riyl inflụns r a fy swñvotrz in a fy swñsīts, pǎrfl mīdịbáṛnz hu set ɖ nyz’jnda n wlʈi donrz hu śep ɖ poḷsi ofr in ɖer inṭrests.

Ɖ oltrṇtiv z t apil t ɖ cuntri’z letnt pṛgresiv mjoṛti ɖt gz bac decedz. Last Ʈrzde, ɖs pṛgresiv vot amǎntd t ovr 60%, ẃl ɖ Toriz scord jst 29%. T moḅlîz it mīnz recgnîzñ ɖt difṛns n dîvrṣti, wɖn a brōdli comn valyset, z a streñʈ nt a wìcnis n ɖt ɖ bst fyćr z ngośietd nt impozd. Criticli it alǎz s t win ilex́nz bî spīcñ t ɖ inṭrests v ɖ sntr n left, nt ɖ rît.

Bt ẃ w’nt Cir Starmr n Lebr’z old gard tec ɖs sīmñli obvịs rùt t win, n g wɖ ɖ flo v last wīc’s rzults?

Tori HQ n its pres atacdogz wl trî t unḍmain it, prisîsli bcz ɖe fir a traficlît pinsrmuvmnt. Bt f a huñ parḷmnt sīmz most lîcli, ɖen it’s bst t priper fr it.

Hvr, Lebr’z nrṿs hîrarci sīmz wilñ t d enʈñ t mnten its mnoṗli v opziśn n ɖ dispṛporśṇt pǎr it gvz it. Ɖr cn b no ny partiz undr FPƉP bcz ɖ entribarịrz r tù hî. Rmembr, it tecs jst 50,000 vots p’ Lebr MP bt fr ɖ Grīnz ɖt’s 865,000. It z a deṃcratic obseṇti dzînd t enśur uɖr poḷtiśnz n votrz despṛt t dīl wɖ ɖ clîṃt crîsis, pṛtct sivl liḅtiz or iradcet poṿti hv nẃr els t g.

Lebr straṭjists wl b gamḅlñ ɖt ɖ Grīn n Lib Dem votśer cn b sqizd. Bt ɖz r’nt ɖ deḟrenśl dez v ɖ last snć̣ri, ppl wl fînd n vot fr ẃt ɖe si az betr oltrṇtivz.

Jrñ ɖ līdrśp ilex́n, Starmr sd: “W’v got t adres ɖ fact ɖt miłnz v ppl vot in sefsīts n ɖe fīl ɖer vot dz’nt cǎnt.” H wz rît ɖen. H c’nt b alaud t b roñ nǎ.

Ɖ stecs cd nt b hayr: ɖ sulfyṛs ẃif v rîtwñ oʈoṛterịnizm z olrdi stîḟlñ. W nīd coopṛtiv poḷtics az an act v slf-inṭrest n hop.

***

Nìl Lwsn z d’rectr v ɖ cros-parti campen orġnîześn Cumṗs

Instroduction to Ñspel

"House by the Railroad," Edward Hopper, 1925

Fṛm Đ Gardịn: Today’s elections are the last before the Tories vandalise our democratic rights

A protest against the elections bill in Parliament Square, London, in February. Photograph: Hollie Adams/Getty Images
A protest agnst ɖ ilex́nzbil in Parḷmnt Sqer, Lundn, in Febrri. Foṭgraf: Hóli Admz/Geti Iṃjz

Tde’z ilex́nz r ɖ last bfr ɖ Tōriz vanḍlîz ǎr deṃcratic rîts

(Transcription of an article published in the Guardian on 5 May 2022)

Ɖ ilex́nzbil wl dtŕ non-Tori s’portrz fṛm votñ n scrap eni oṿsît. Rform z nīdd mor ɖn evr bfr

Polly Toynbee

Poli Tônbi, Ʈrzde, 5 Me 2022

Tde z ɖ last tîm y wl g t ɖ poulz bfr ɖ guvnmnt’s śemfl n śemlis ny ilex́nzbil bcmz lw. It wz sqizd ʈru parḷmnt lêt at nît last wīc in ɖ fînl “woś-up” v bad bilz bfr ɖ end v ɖ seśn.

Ɖ bil’z Trumpiś votrs’preśn z dzînd t dtŕ pur n yuñ ppl fṛm votñ. Its pasñ olso mcs ɖz ɖ last ilex́nz t b monitrd n scrūṭnîzd bî a jenyinli indipndnt Ilectṛl Cmiśn. Ɖs hbić̣li timid ǎtfit traid t stand p fr itslf: “Ɖ indipndns v ɖ Ilectṛl Cmiśn z vîtl t ɖ fuñṣ́nñ v a hlʈi dmocṛsi,” it sd. Bt, az v nǎ, Boris Jonsn n hiz alîz wl set ɖer ǒn trmz fr ɖ cmiśn, includñ its scrūṭni v fînans.

Evri votr wl nīd a foto ID fṛm nǎ on, so 7.5% v votrz, or 3.5 miłn ppl, wɖt a drîvñlîsns or a pasport wl hv t b dtrmind inuf t trec t ɖer locl caunsl ofis, hv ɖer foto tecn n fil ǎt an apḷceśn wɖ a cǎnṭsigṇćr. It’s wrʈ notñ ɖt ɖ DVLA n ɖ Pasport Ofis r in crîsis: jst trî bcñ an rjnt pasportslot. Enwn lcñ at ǎr votñpatnz wd wuri abt tù fy ppl trnñ ǎt, nt ppl votñ twîs. Ɖ risc v “prṣneśn” – ćītñ on îdntti – z miṇskl: in 2017 ɖr wz wn cnvix́n, in 2018 nn at ol. In a grosli unfer n undeṃcratic ilectṛl sistm, ɖ proḅti n oṇsti v its oṗreśn z ɖ wn aspect t b prǎd v.

Ɖ Tori-léd public admiṇstreśn n consttyśnl aferz cmiti pṛdyst a devstetñ condmneśn v ɖ bil. Ɖe esṭmetd 2.3% v votrz wd b dtrd fṛm votñ, or 1.1 miłn ppl, hu wd probbli b ɖoz on lo incmz, fṛm eʈnic mnoṛtiz n wɖ dis’biḷtiz. Ɖe wornd ɖt tù mć arbitrri dscreśn wd b left t poulñsteśn stāf t axpt or rjct ID, cōzñ kz n rǎz.

F y dǎt ɖs z a cnspiṛsi t stop non-Tōriz votñ, lc at ɖ onli ID ɖt z axptbl bynd pasports n drîvñlîsnsz: pnśnrz wl b alaud t yz ɖ oldr prsn’z buspas, Ôstr 60+ or Sīńr 60+ SmartPas – ẃl yuñ ppl wl b bàrd fṛm yzñ ɖer relcardz. Ɖ guvnmnt rjctd Lord Wilits’ amndmnt 86 trayñ t includ a wîd renj v dokmnts fr ol ejz. Oldr ppl r ɖ mn yzrz v postl vots – ẃć w’nt rqîr ID. Ol ɖs z śrli nt unc̣nctd wɖ ɖ Tōriz’ 47-pônt līd amñ ɖ ovr-65z, n Lebr’z 43-pônt līd amñ undr 25z az v 2019.

Ɖ Spectetr hz cîndli asmbld no fywr ɖn 11 raitñz n seyñz bî Jonsn xcorietñ ID cardz, startñ wɖ, “I loɖ ɖ îdīa on prínsipl. I nvr wont t b cmandd, bî eni eṃneśn v ɖ Britiś stet, t pṛdys evidns v mî îdntti … I wl tec ɖt card ǎt v mî wolit n fizicli īt it.” Bt nǎ ID cardz srv hiz onli rmenñ p’liticl prṗs: t gt riilectd.

Ɖ bil’z uɖr aboṃneśn cnsrnz ɖ reḷtivli ny meṛl n p’līs n crîm cmiśnr ilex́nz: it swīps awe ɖ preznt secnd-prefṛns sistm in fevr v ɖ unferist v ol, ɖ antīc frst past ɖ post (FPTP). Ẃ? Bcz Tōriz r mor lîcli t win undr FPTP. Ɖr r mor anti-Tori pṛgresiv votrz, hu transfr ɖer secnd prefṛnsz t anɖr pṛgresiv parti, bt rerli t a Tori.

Az Nìl Lwsn, hu advcets a pṛgresiv alayns, rout eḷqntli ɖs wīc, a mjoṛti-pṛgresiv vot z yẓ́li dzastṛsli dvîdd. Tde, in 82% v ilex́nz ɖr wl b at līst tū pṛgresiv canddets splitñ ɖer vot, standñ agnst jst wn Cnsrṿtiv, acordñ t Jon Narcros v ɖ Ilectṛl-Rform Ssayti. Pṛporśnl repriznteśn (PR) wd, t boro a frêz, “levl up” vots, so ɖe d’nt pîl p westd. PR nǎ gts stroñ public s’port, acordñ t YGuv, wɖ 44% in fevr, n onli 27% fr frst past ɖ post.

Ɖ last wīc, wɖ sevn frunt pejz v ɖ Meil n uɖrz pîlñ in, trayñ t mc Cir Starmr’z bir n curi on ɖ campen trel az bad az Dǎnñ Strīt’s 12 partiz, z jst anɖr grim rmîndr v ɖ monstṛs heft v ɖ rîtwñ pres, yzd unscrūpyḷsli t sev its multimiłner ǒnrz fṛm ɖ perilz v Lebr in pǎr.

Lebr, f it bcmz ɖ bigist parti at ɖ nxt jenṛl ilex́n, mst līd ɖ we t ilectṛl rform. Lebr z hîli unlîcli t win alon, so ɖs tîm ɖ Libṛl Deṃcrats n ol ɖ uɖr partiz mst dmand PR imīɉtli, az its frst act or rfyz eni cooṗreśn on enʈñ els. Ɖr z no nīd fr a reḟrendm, jst d it. Reḟrenḍmz r toxic poḷtics – n ɖ Tōriz cn hardli cmplen ẃn ɖe hv jerimandrd, pṛrogd n s’prest opozñ vots, ɖer mndeśs presclac dstortñ eni fer vôs, wɖ totl disrigard fr ẃt z nǎ a brocn consttyśn. Jonsn hz cild of Pītr Heṇsi’z ʈiyri v a “gd ćaps” consttyśn, wn in ẃć practiśnrz hold dir nt jst ɖ rūlz ɖmslvz bt olso ɖer spirit.

So ẃt śd pṛgresiv “gd ćaps”, b ɖe mel or fīmel, d at ɖ cloz v a Jonsn ira? Ɖt mć z clir. Ɖe śd fīl fri t intṛdys a votñsistm ɖt wl stop eni c’rupt parti wɖ a mnoṛti v vots evr guṿnñ alon agn wɖ dicttorịl pǎrz.

Instroduction to Ñspel

Fṛm Đ Gardịn │ As events in the US have shown, two-party politics is no longer fit for purpose

Donald Trump and Joe Biden. Photograph: Jim Watson/AFP/Getty Images
Doṇld Trump n Jo Bîdn. Foṭgraf: Jim Wotsn/AFP/Geti Iṃjz

Az ivnts in ɖ YS hv śoun, tū-parti poḷtics z no longr fit fr prṗs

(Transcription of a Guardian article of 16 February 2021)

Lrćñ fṛm Obama t Trump t Bîdn, ɖ sistm dnîz cọliśnz v compṛmîz. N in ɖ YC, ć parti z rivn wɖ conflict

Poli Tônbi, 16 Febrri 2021

Ɖ  wn ivnt mor ǎtrejs ɖn a mob stormñ ɖ Cápitl wz ɖ specṭcl v 43 Rpublicn seṇtrz indorsñ ɖ atmtd cù n its insṭgetr. Bî rfyzñ t impīć Doṇld Trump, ɖe left ol uɖr dmocṛsiz agast, dlîtñ ōṭcrats evrẃr.

“Ɖs sad ćaptr in ǎr hisṭri hz rmîndd s ɖt dmocṛsi z frajîl,” sd Jo Bîdn. Frajîl indd, ẃn ɖ rstẃl līdrz v ɖ deṃcratic wrld rfyz t dfnd dmocṛsi’z frst prínsipl, ɖ trnziśn v pǎr bî luzr’z cnsnt. Ẃ boɖr lowrñ America’z fǎndeśn dokmnts nîtli intu a ńclir bomprūf śltr bnʈ ɖ Naśnl Arcîvz, ẃn ɖe r ript p bî Congres in brōd dêlît?

Ɖ riyl cù hapnd ẃn ɖ Rpublicn parti wz capćrd bî Trump, ʈrowñ moḍrets undr hiz ćarịtẃīlz. Ẃt sevd him fṛm impićmnt wz hiz yeld-ǎt wornñ t Rpublicnz at hiz “Sev America” rali: “F ɖe d’nt fît, w hv t prîṃri ɖ hel ǎt v [ɖm],” h sd. “W’r gwñ t let y nǒ hu ɖe r.” H tld hiz mob: “Y’r gwñ t start wrcñ on Congres n w got t gt rid v ɖ wìc congres-ppl, ɖ wnz ɖt r’nt eni gd, ɖ Liz Ćeniz v ɖ wrld. W got t gt rid v ɖm.”

Ɖ sevn Rpublicn seṇtrz hu derd t vot t impīć hv cm undr atac fṛm ɖer locl partiz, tū v ɖm anǎnsñ ɖe r standñ dǎn, n ɖ 10 Hǎs Rpublicnz hu std agnst him olrdi fes Trumpîts trayñ t unsīt ɖm. Doṇld Trump Jr. hz twītd: “Let’s impīć RINOz [Rpublicnz In Nem Onli] fṛm ɖ Rpublicn parti!!!”

Fir v dīṣlx́n z a dspicbl rīzn fr felñ t puniś a cù. Sm r jenyin Trump fnatics bt mni r jst sevñ ɖer jobz.

Wsminstr, lîc Wośñtn, sufrz wîdspred “dren ɖ swomp” votrsiṇsizm abt ilectd repriznttivz; on dorsteps y hír it ol ɖ tîm: “Ɖ’r ol ɖ sem, onli in it fr ɖmslvz.”

Rpublicnz r left t fît ǎt ɖer fyćr lîc rats trapt in a sác. Bt wns a parti z capćrd bî xtrimists, it’s hard t pl it bac t ilectbiḷti: Trump hz nvr wún ɖ popylr vot, h wz nirli 3m vots bhnd Hiḷri Clintn in 2016. In a tū-parti frst-past-ɖ-post ilectṛl sistm (FPĐP), capćrñ a parti z ɖ onli we t ćenj poḷtics: FPĐP’z ayn ilectṛl lw barz ny partiz imrjñ t riact t ny srcmstansz. Ɖ wòrn-ǎt dfns v FPĐP z ɖt it criets “stbiḷti”: ɖt’s nt hǎ ɖ YS fīlz, lrćñ fṛm Baṛc Obama t Trump t Bîdn, ɖ sistm dnayñ cọliśnz v compṛmîz. Bʈ cuntriz’ dmocṛsiz r feld bî ɖer arcêic votñsistmz.

In ɖ YC, loñ ago, ɖ Tori parti wz capćrd bî Brextrīmists, az fr yirz tîni locl partiz v mostli old ẃît men s’lectd onli Yrofobz. Cén Clārc n Mîcl Hesltîn wr prjd, alñ wɖ uɖr prominnt anti-Brexitrz. Eni “moḍrets” ɖt rmend cevd t Boris Jonsn’z stoncñ 80-sīt mjoṛti, wún partli bcz ǎr dyoṗli ofrd onli Jeṛmi Corbin az oltrṇtiv prîm̦inistr. Ɖo I n ɖ Gardịn bact Corbin az betr ɖn ɖ rog Jonsn, ɖ ćôs wz a deṃcratic ǎtrej. Aftr a craśñ dfit, Lebr trnd pragmatic, ćuzñ an ilectbl līdr, bt it z stl rivn btwn leftists hu jônd fr Corbin n ɖoz hu rjônd fr Cir Starmr, mcñ s’lex́nz fr locl ofis or MP a fmiłr tug v wor.

Ć parti’s frajîl cọliśn z destind t stradl a cuntri dvîdd acrs ńmṛs p’liticl fōltlînz. Jonsn’z ny red-wōl sīts dmand hî norɖn spendñ, opozd bî tṛdiśnl smōl-stet lo-taxrz v hiz suɖn śîrz n subrbz. Jonsn swivlz btwn rbełs anti-locdǎn libterịnz n mor cōśs red wōlrz n old focs: woć ɖ ōtm spendñ rvy fors dfînñ ćôsz. Lebr z struc dum on Brexit’s mni c’lamiṭs rzults, bcz its ŕbn, ynvrṣtitǎn, eʈnic mnoṛti n yuñ bes z irecnsîḷbl wɖ ɖoz norɖn Brexit sīts Lebr imajinz it cn rgen. Nvr hz ǎr ilectṛl sistm lct les ebl t rflect votrz’ vyz.

Starmr z suṃnñ a consttyśnl rvy, so far foc̣st on dīṿluśn n fedṛlizm, in ɖ ven hop v spîcñ ɖ Scotiś Naśnl parti (SNP). It nīdz t pt ilectṛl rform at ɖ fōrfrunt. A yir ago, Starmr sd: “W’v got t adres ɖ fact ɖt miłnz v ppl vot in sef sīts n ɖe fīl ɖer vot dz’nt cǎnt. Ɖt’s got t b adrest. W wl nvr gt fl ptiṣpeśn in ǎr ilectṛl sistm untl w d ɖt at evri levl.” Indd, siṇsizm z bréd fṛm ppl fīlñ ɖer vot w’nt afct an ilex́n’z ǎtcm.

Fy xpct Lebr t win ɖ nesṣri 124 sīts nxt tîm, plus bǎnḍrićenjz wl gift ɖ Tōriz 10 mor. An alayns z ɖ onli rùt, so forj a páct nǎ, az advcetd bî Cumṗs, wɖ Libṛl Deṃcrats, Grīnz n, yes, ɖ SNP, sìld bî a plej on ilectṛl rform. In 2019, mor ppl votd left v sntr ɖn Tori.

A pṛporśnl sistm wd alǎ bʈ mizṛbl old partiz t dvors. Instd v holdñ nozz t vot fr ɖ līst wrst, votrz on ɖ rît cd ćūz btwn pro-Yṛpiyn Mcmiḷnîts or ɖ Boris-Gov wrld v Brexit dīreğleśnfanṭsi. It’s hî tîm votrz on ɖ left wr rlist fṛm Lebr’z dsfuñśnl forst marij, fri t ćūz btwn an oʈntic soṣ́list parti n a sośl deṃcratic parti (ɖo ɖe wd stl hv t wrc tgɖr).

No ilectṛl sistm dvîzd bî ɖ crŭcid timbr v hymaṇti solvz ol probḷmz. Bt a fyćr v cọliśnz wd si ɖ pǎr v fax́nz wɖn a rūlñguvnmnt dfînd trnspaṛntli bî ilectṛl vots. It wd mīn no mor xtrim fax́nz amḅśñ s’lex́nprosesz wɖn partiz, v ɖ cnd ɖt caud Rpublicnz ovr impićmnt. Brecñ ɖ tū-parti stretjacit opnz p ɖ plŭṛlizm ɖt z wn v mni tsts in ɖ Icoṇmist Intelijns Ynit’s globl dmocṛsi indx. In 2020, it rports, onli 8.4% v ɖ wrld’z ppl livd undr a fŭli-fuñṣ́nñ dmocṛsi – frajîl indd.

Poli Tônbi z a Gardịn coḷmnist

***

MOR ARTICLZ Fṛm Đ Gardịn

Instroduction to Ñspel